Defensive Policing: It’s not what you might think

Defensive Policing; Large cities burn as politicians turn on cops.

Defensive Policing; Large cities burn as politicians turn on cops.

I suppose that this story could be filed in the “Well, Duh” category. We have reported on SOTG Radio the record-breaking spike in violent crime in Baltimore in the wake of the blitzkrieg indictments of six police officers there.

Chairman de Blasio was quick to throw NYPD officers under the bus in his city, thus earning their ire and distrust. And, let us not forget the DOJ war on local police departments nationwide and their threats of “Pattern or Practice” Investigations from Baltimore all the way down to Mayberry, USA.

The following article was shared with me by a friend and I found it so illustrative that I had to share it with you. The author is an “MD” and he hits the nail right on the head by comparing “defensive medicine” practices with the new trend of “defensive policing.” Dr. Brian C. Joondeph published this piece on the American Thinker and we owe him a debt for the cogent explanation.

(from American Thinker June 7, 2015)

Defensive medicine is how physicians protect themselves from lawsuits. Whether ordering extra and unnecessary tests or avoiding high-risk patients, these measures reduce the chance of physicians facing a malpractice lawsuit for a bad outcome or missed diagnosis. At least 75 percent of physicians practice defensive medicine at an annual cost estimated to be $650 billion per year.

Medicine is an inexact science. Diseases don’t always manifest as described in textbooks. What seems like indigestion could in reality be a heart attack. And vice versa. Diagnostic tests are expensive and certain tests carry their own risks. Financial barriers such as insurance restrictions, preauthorization, and paperwork add additional barriers so physicians make their best judgment based on the evidence in front of them and their experience. If their decision in the heat of the moment, based on the information at hand and their desire to provide the best possible care to their patient, turns out to be wrong, their life can be turned upside down by a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Defensive Policing: Us versus Them

Defensive Policing: Us versus Them

Compare being a physician to being a policeman. Threatening situations are even less predictable for policemen than for physicians. Human beings, particularly criminals, don’t behave in a rational or predictable manner. Incomplete information adds to the mix. Is that real or toy gun? Is the suspect waving a knife for show or is it directed at my throat? Just as in medicine, decisions must be made quickly and with incomplete or conflicting information. While serious injury or death can result from a wrong decision, in medicine, unlike in law enforcement, the physician won’t be shot dead if they make the wrong decision.

Six Baltimore police officers were indicted in connection with the death of Freddie Gray who died while in police custody after arrest. Did the police officers commit “police malpractice”? Did they deviate from the “standard of care” during the arrest and detention process? Who knows? Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby, before any investigation of the facts and circumstances, saw that they were indicted. A trial awaits the policemen, but meanwhile their lives are ruined, professionally and financially.

Move west to Ferguson, Missouri where police officer Darren Wilson had his life turned upside down after shooting the “gentle giant” Michael Brown. The “hands up don’t shoot” meme, perpetuated by the media, politicians, and athletes turned out to be a lie. Although accused of police malpractice, Officer Wilson actually did adhere to the “standard of care” of policing.

President Obama has also joined the knee-jerk chorus of blaming the police before knowing any facts. In 2009 he claimed Cambridge, Massachusetts police “acted stupidly” in arresting a Harvard professor. Yet the president acknowledged, “I don’t know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played.”

What’s a cop to do? While he can’t order extra tests, he can avoid the “high risk” patients as physicians do. If he observes criminal activity, he can look the other way or take his time responding until the crime is over. The result is defensive law enforcement. And like defensive medicine, it is on the rise.

Predictably, arrests are down. In Baltimore, “Police are booking fewer than half the number of people they pulled off the streets last year.” Crime is up and the police are nowhere to be seen. “May 2015 is already the deadliest month in 15 years” in Baltimore as police are playing defense. As one Baltimore resident described, “Before it was over-policing. Now there’s no police.”

Ditto in New York City, where arrests and tickets are also on the decline. Remember Eric Garner who died during his arrest in Staten Island? And the reaction of Mayor de Blasio, throwing the cops under the bus based on the “dangers” they pose? Yet despite all the accusations, the cops were cleared of any wrongdoing. The police, knowing they don’t have the support of their boss when they do their job and try to enforce the law, will stop enforcing the law. Hence the drop in arrests.

Medicine and law enforcement are inexact sciences. The vast majority of physicians and police officers are dedicated to their professions and strive to do their best, often under challenging circumstances. Incomplete or conflicting information means they make judgment calls. Usually correct but sometimes not. And when the wrong call is made, physicians face a malpractice lawsuit and police face indictment and prison.

The natural response is to avoid the high-risk situations. Stop accepting new patients, particularly sick patients with a greater chance of complications. Order extra tests to avoid missing a diagnosis, however unlikely. For police, just look the other way. Take your time responding to a distress call. Don’t make the arrest. And watch the crime rate climb.

Leave Your Comments Below

Leave Your Comments Below

The following two tabs change content below.

Paul Markel

Founder & President at Student of the Gun
Paul G. Markel has worn many hats during his lifetime. He has been a U.S. Marine, Police Officer, Professional Bodyguard, and Small Arms and Tactics Instructor. Mr. Markel has been writing professionally for law enforcement and firearms periodicals for nearly twenty years with hundreds and hundreds of articles in print. Paul is a regular guest on nationally syndicated radio talk shows and subject matter expert in firearms training and use of force. Mr. Markel has been teaching safe and effective firearms handling to students young and old for decades and has worked actively with the 4-H Shooting Sports program. Paul holds numerous instructor certifications in multiple disciplines and a Bachelor’s degree in conflict resolution; nonetheless, he is and will remain a dedicated Student of the Gun.

Latest posts by Paul Markel (see all)

Comments

  1. Robert Margulies

    As an ex Police Officer, and a Retired Naval Officer with ground combat experience, and an Emergency physician with 46 years, and going, professional experience:
    Bravo Zulu, and well said;
    and guess who pays for the POLITICAL MALPRACTICE:
    why just the honest folks; the shopkeepers and the shoppers; the homeowners and the renters; the auto dealers and the drivers; the schoolteachers and the students…
    Stay fit
    Stay trained
    Stay prepared
    Stay armed.

  2. Neil

    There is a reason they say “Big cases, big problems; Little cases, little problems; No cases…No problems”

  3. Arturo Ceron

    I’m amazed anybody becomes a cop these days … and those that want to become one probably don’t truly understand what they’re getting into.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *